Either is in the ancient time or today world, the success of a country is largely determined by the leader of that particular nation. Born as a commoner, Liu Bang, appeared to be more aware to the suffering of the common people. Given himself a name “Han Gaozu”, he acted corresponding to the basis of an ancient philosopher, Xunzi’s saying: “The prince is the boat; the common people are the water. The water can support the boat, or the water can capsize the boat” (Morton and Louis, 76). Once he came into his throne, he immediately gave an order to abolish the brutal law of the Qin and restrained his army from looting. By giving peace to the people, he gained the respect from them. Though he was a rude and direct, these common traits, however, “gave his leadership a certain appeal” especially when he decided to discard the policy of Qin Legalism and absolutism that he certainly against to when he used to be a commoner (Morton and Louis, 78). Most impressively, Han Gaozu had the “combination of determination and flexibility”, in which he was willing to retain the standardization and centralization from Qin Dynasty—such as unifying writing system, imperial academy, empire wide legal code and so on—that brought true benefits to the people (Lewis, 64). Realizing the need of order and dignity, he formed a special court procedure that based upon Confucian ideas. He was once a bandit chief and then a successful general, in which made this decision tough for him, as he questioned: “I got the empire on horseback, why should I bother with the Odes or History?” (Morton and Louis, 78). It is even hard for him to marry a Chinese princess to the son of Xiongnu’s emperor, in order avoid the war, under the realization that his dynasty was too weak to confront with anymore destruction (Morton and Louis, 80). Due to the all efforts he made during his reign, an era of a prosperity and stability, hence, begun.
However, it is impossible for a peace and stabilized dynasty to be formed immediately. After a fifteen-year crisis of Empress Lu, the Han Dynasty was back under the control of these two wise rulers successively: Wen-ti (180-157 B.C.) and Ching-ti (157-141 B.C.). Both of these rulers play an important role in the consolidation of the Former Han Dynasty. Though there was nothing extraordinary during Emperor Wen-ti’s reign, his faithfulness in continuing the previous policies and “creating a favourable environment for the development and organization” of the Han Dynasty, were his major achievement (Pfeuti). Emperor Wen-ti had a lovely wife, who was strongly influenced by Taoist writing, in turn conveyed the idea of Taoism to his son, Emperor Ching-ti (Pfeuti). Very much similar to his father, he was a man that listened to the advice of his men and thought from the perspective of the commoners. Emperor Ching-ti, with the help of the two officers, Chia I and Ch’ao Ts’o who embraced Confucian’s ideas (Pfeuti), thus set the strong foundation of the Former Han Dynasty. To instil peace back to the country, he sent a troop of army to gain control over the rebel of the kings, especially those from the remote areas; after that, he divided the kingdoms into a numerous small ones, assigned them to his relatives, and into commanderies placed under his direct rule (Pfeuti). Instead of exercising a more direct and intensified control, he also created a dynasty with perfect livelihood for the people as he reduced the tax and abolished some severe punishment (Pfeuti). During the reign of these two noble man, Emperor Wen-ti and Emperor Ching-ti, the Han Dynasty reached its most peaceful and unification era.
As the interior of China became stabilized, Emperor Wu-ti, the “Martial Emperor”, planned to lead the Han Dynasty to a new era (Gernet, Foster, and Hartman, 121). “Able and fiercely ambitious, he set a new style of personal control of the government process” (Morton and Louis, 80). During his reign, he made a number of impressive changes that never one dares to have a try before. To stretch his influence outward, the first step was to eliminate their biggest enemies, Xiongnu, which was “the great nomadic empire that ruled the lands to the north and the northwest of the Han” from long time ago (Lewis, 20). Tired of bribing them again, Emperor Wu-ti sent Chang Ch’ien out to find alliance; after experienced a ten-year prison crisis by the Xiongnu, Chang Ch’ien brought back not only the information about the countries beyond barbarians, but also opened the emperor’s eyes on the possibility of profitable trades (Converging and Diverging, 79-80). Not to mention that this later economic development—trade with the people beyond China, especially through silk road—played an important role in contributing to the military expansion (Gernet, Foster, and Hartman, 120). From the very first conquest, Xiongnu, until the south, the southwest, Korea and Eastern Central Asia, Han Dynasty reached its glorious moment with its greatest size—eighty-four commanderies and eighteen kingdoms under his reign (Lewis, 21). Though he was portrayed as not an “easy master” and was “hard” to either chancellors or generals, he still received respect and loyalty because of the general morale, patriotism, and self-confidence ran high during his long reign (Morton and Louis, 81). He seems to be an enlightened ruler too. Instead of the external policy, Emperor Wu-ti Ti increasingly ruled as “a patron of a Chinese Civilization embodied in the canon, the imperial academy, and the classic virtues”, in which he encouraged the revival of Confucian studies and also the recruitment of the best scholar for his administration through examination (Lewis, 67; Bishop, 152; Morton and Louis, 53). As a result, the ideology of Confucianism was lasted for almost two-thousand years, until the last imperial dynasty was overthrown in 1911; nonetheless, Confucianism is still having its great influence in China today (Wright, 53). Emperor Wu-ti, who cultivated the most prosperity era of the Han Dynasty, was the sparkling star amongst all the successors of this dynasty. His external policy, which helped in the formation of the contact between Asia, also brought the Former Han Dynasty to an international stage.
Though it is debatable that whether each emperor that mentions above are all of wise ruler because they were human beings and human have weaknesses: Liu Bang was accused of lacking of loyalty especially in the case he destroyed his former allies and replaced them with his own kin (Lewis 64, 90); Emperor Wu Ti, however, haunted by superstitious and wanted to be immortal (Morton and Louis, 54). Perhaps most the emperors had the fear to lose their throne, so neither did they allow anyone to share any political power with them nor did they accept their fate on death. Sarcastically, nothing is everlasting. Neither did the Former Han Dynasty. The ultimate fall of the Former Han Dynasty—which was resulted from the selfish rulers that put themselves before the people—demonstrates that the success of Former Han Dynasty was underlined by the appropriate policies from the responsible rulers. Taking much of its good foundation and getting rid of the bad policies, the Former Han Dynasty was built upon Qin. With further development, it turned out to be the one of the most glorious dynasty in China’s history. Till today, people of China are still referring themselves as “sons of Han” (Morton and Louis, 78). Without those wise rulers, it is almost impossible for the incredible accomplishments which helped to gain reputation, not only within their own people, but amongst the nations around the world.
Works Cited
Lewis, Mark Edward, The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. Harvards University Press, 2007.
Morton, W Scott, and Louis Charlton. China: Its History and Culture. McGraw-Hill Companies, 2004.
Wright, David C. History of China. Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated, 2001.
Gernet, Jacquest, Foster J.R., and Hartman Charles. A History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Bishop, John L.. Studies if Governmental Institutions in Chinese History. London: Harvards University Press, 1968.
Edward , Mark. "The Han Dynasty". National Geographic Feb 2004.
Pfeuti, Sandrine. "Asian-centre Net Collective". 20 December 2008